4.13.2007

Don Imus and his Corporate Minders

by Rick Rockwell

Don Imus may be gone (for the moment) but the problem that kept him around for decades despite his racist commentaries is still with us: the corporate media.

Today, CBS and MSNBC are trying to look like champions because they pulled the trigger on Imus, and sacrificed millions in advertising revenue. But the truth is, originally, both corporations were happy just to suspend the racist shock jock for a few weeks until the current storm ended. What they didn’t anticipate was an internal revolt by high-priced celebrities incensed by the initial slap on the wrist the corporate bosses gave Imus. They also didn’t anticipate that advertisers would also find Imus’ hateful comments unacceptable.

The bottom line is what fired Imus, not any sense of social responsibility. When his advertisers started to bail, and therefore his profit potential receded, that’s when the corporate bosses got serious. That’s just simple media economics.

For those who haven’t followed this controversy, please check out Jeff Siegel’s excellent commentary from earlier this week (entitled “Honky Honky”). Imus was finally undone because he called the Rutgers women’s basketball team “nappy-headed hos.” However, Imus has been getting away with such comments for years, or encouraging his sidekicks to utter such trash. Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR) and Media Matters for America have both documented a long list of racist, sexist, or homophobic statements emanating from Imus or his program.

But Imus got a pass from the corporate media because his syndicated program pulled in more than two million people daily. Because of his place on CBS Radio and show on MSNBC he was able to get famous pundits, journalists and politicians to speak. They should have done what editors for Newsweek did this week, and declare they would encourage their journalists not to appear on Imus' program because of its racist content. However, for years, guests wouldn’t decline an invitation from Imus because of the millions who would be listening. All of them – the guests, the listeners and the corporate bosses – should be ashamed today that they helped support racism for years.

Wrongly, some have tried to couch this issue as one of free speech. Yes, Imus has the right to mouth these offensive sayings if he wants. Let him stand on a street corner and do so, or spend his millions on a newspaper to print them, or start his own blog. He has that right in America, no matter the content. But he has no right to use the public airwaves to further his hateful ideas and inspire the growth of those ideas in others. Some who protested Imus’ latest commentaries had threatened to take him and his bosses to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). His firing certainly takes away that threat.

But more than that, both the commentaries of other media personalities and the desertion of advertisers forced his bosses to take action. Oprah Winfrey lambasted Imus on her program just hours before he was dismissed. By the way, a subsidiary of CBS, King World distributes Winfrey’s talkshow, and the corporate bosses no doubt realize how her audience dwarfs Imus and his fans. Also, Al Roker, the usually genial personality from NBC’s Today, used his blog to urge the corporate bosses to cancel the simulcast of Imus' radio show on MSNBC. A house divided cannot stand, even in the corporate world.

Finally, when General Motors pulled its advertising that was the real end of Imus. In the media world, car advertising is king. Some have speculated that Imus may follow Howard Stern from CBS to satellite radio, but not if GM has anything to say about it. By the way, GM is a major investor in satellite radio.

Given the way corporate media works, Imus will likely resurface somewhere because he has that track record of delivering viewers and listeners. Whoever hires him though has no shame: who wants the kind of audience such a man attracts?

(The cartoon is from radicalgraphics.org, which offers its material for free.)







Add to Technorati Favorites

Digg!
Subscribe in a reader

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Imus has been doing the same schtick for 30 years. Here's a sample from the 70s
http://wrestlingperspective.com/imus/

Why is anyonne surprised?

News Media Studier said...

The corporate sponsors made the right move. Now if only they would do the same with Ann Coulter...

Anonymous said...

Imus makes for endlessly interesting blogging. No doubt he crossed the line. I don't believe he is a racist per se but I do believe in effect that he hates everyone. His hateful comments about the Rutgers team finally resulted in his ruination.

One tangential point that I think of interest is how everyone has tried to spin this to their personal interests since day one. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton spin to their self interests, as do Rush Limbaugh and it seems all points in between. So... why should we bloggers not be permitted to spin too?

Are we fast becoming a nation of "spinners". Well let me spin my opinion. Is our President not supposed to be a father figure to the nation and hence his behavior influences our behavior?

President Bush and his team have tried to spin the war in Iraq since day one. From the lies to justify the war to not allowing caskets of our dead soldiers to be shown all the way to trying to spin this weeks events.

What happened this week in Iraq? Well... notwithstanding our great President's masterful plan to save Iraq implemented months ago, a suicide bomber managed to blow himself up in the Iraqi parliament well inside the green zone, the most heavily guarded area in Iraq.

The next day the Bushies were already spinning.... "we are in the early stages of the new plan"... "deaths are down in Baghdad since we started the new plan"..... Bottom line here is that the green zone has incredible amounts of troops guarding it. It is should be impossible to try to spin the story of the suicide bomber in the heart of the green zone. But so what... the father figure of our nation, Mr. Bush, brazenly tried to spin the story to make us believe all is well. The Bush admin seems to think that positive press is all it takes to keep the American public in line, reality be damned.

So... is it an exageration to spin on the Imus story as a way to attack our father figure president Bush ? Yes! but as they say, like father like son!!

Rick Rockwell said...

Sometimes it is amazing to see how the comment section takes on a life of its own.

Who would have thought a reaction to the Imus incident would inspire commentary about the president's policies on Iraq? But if there's more of that, to quote our leader: "Bring it on!"

I'm guessing that more commentary like that though is best found in ”Iraq is the New Korea”among other posts. I don't think it is too much of a stretch to tie Imus to those ultimately responsible for his existence: his corporate sponsors and corporate bosses.

But ultimately, there are those who agree with him or find him entertaining (although I don't know how you can find a cranky bigot entertaining). As long as there is an audience for the homophobia and hate spewed by Imus or Coulter then there will be those willing to package it for a profit. (Thanks NMS for the Coulter comment.)

Finally, I was not surprised by what Imus said. My only surprise was that someone finally did something about it. I have never liked his act (if it is an act rather than a commentary) and count him among those who ruined radio.

Scotus said...

I was with you right up until the end.

I have no problem with Imus being fired. If it had been an isolated incident, I might think people were overreacting. But as you say, he has a history of these comments, most of them far worse than "nappy-headed hos."

But I disagree with the "whoever hires him though has no shame" part. As far as I'm concerned, the Rutgers team saying they forgive him ends this particular saga. They, not guys like Al Sharpton, are the ones who were hurt by this. If they say it's over, it's over.

Imus says he's learned his lesson. Maybe it's true, and maybe it's not, but he deserves a chance to prove it.

Rick Rockwell said...

Scotus, perhaps you are the more reasonable one on this and usually I am all about redemption.

However, decades of such examples and second chances (this is not the first time Imus has been fired) tell me he will just go right back to it.

Jeff Siegel said...

good friend of mine, Frank Wooten, is white and Republican and conservative. But that wasn't enough to stop the Imus show from calling him fat and gay. Real sweethearts, those guys. See http://www.charleston.net/assets/webPages/departmental/news/OldStories.aspx?section=commentary&NEWSID=139084&pubDate=4/15/2007

Rick Rockwell said...

If you'd like to see the article that Jeff references, please click here.

© iVoryTowerz 2006-2009

Blogger Templates by OurBlogTemplates.com 2008