Privilege, Conservatives & The Internet
by Rick Rockwell
Some doubt that a digital divide still exists. That divide between those who take internet access for granted and those who can only get it at school or work or the library if they are lucky has shrunk considerably in the U.S. One source puts regular internet penetration of the U.S. population at about 70 percent.
But a different divide exists. Countries like the U.S. where the upper class and middle class have easy internet access are divided from the rest of the world where the internet is still emerging.
Latin America is certainly one of those regions where internet access is not universal.
Chile has the highest penetration, according to the website Internet World Stats (a firm in Colombia, so likely the Latin American estimates are accurate, and they do correlate with other sources): at about 42 percent. There’s also Argentina at 34 percent, and Costa Rica at 21 percent.
But look at Nicaragua: three percent. Or consider Venezuela, where 13 percent have access.
Is it any wonder then who is using the internet in those countries?
Looking at large swaths of Latin America, usually the internet is only available on a regular basis to the elite. Now, there’s no ideological entryway to the upper class. You can be a rich leftist. But truly, many people in the upper class are conservatives or neo-liberals who are more concerned about protecting their investments than the plight of the poor.
And so, the quality of communication coming from Latin America via internet, especially in countries with elite penetration rates, tells us the information may be skewed from a certain class level.
Sometimes the people writing from their positions in the class system do not even realize how they sound. For instance, a blogger in Venezuela discusses her feelings about President Hugo Chavez and what she sees as radical transformations of her country. She tells her readers she is from the middle class. That means one thing in the U.S. and Europe, but it may not be an accurate reading of where she actually stands in Venezuela. She is part of that elite 13 percent with internet access. Read deeper: her family has a live-in maid, and she travels to Mexico on class trips. Meanwhile, most Venezuelans live on two dollars a day. So perhaps her protestations of Chavez and his reforms, her threats to become part of the country’s elite brain-drain, and her other concerns come from threats to her economic status rather than any real repression.
If there were real repression from leftists like Chavez, would blogs like The Devil’s Excrement exist, unless it was hosted completely outside Venezuela?
These blogs express fear about threats to freedom in Venezuela. Press freedom groups have complained about Chavez. However, he isn’t shutting down opposition websites or newspapers. Although his moves to shut down one Venezuelan network, on the surface, appear questionable, the history of that network’s connection to the unsuccessful coup gives pause.
The complaints of these Latin American bloggers should not be ignored, because even in a skewed way, they track the powerful. But readers should remember, they are also hearing from a powerful class of writers when consuming that material. Let the reader beware, writers of privilege often have a larger purpose behind their complaints.
(For other recent pieces on this theme, please see:
internet
blogs
politics
Venezuela
Latin America
conservative blogs
Hugo Chavez
Add to Technorati Favorites







4 comments:
You might find this interesting:
US falling off Broadband wagon
cheers.
Although I felt deeply offended by this,
I won't question it. Is true, my family has a maid and I traveled to
Mexico. I never deny it, and I have been honest with my origins on
every single entry I have posted. Why do I
felt offended? I feel that is my responsibility to tell you.
My life as a filthy rich person it definitely of the past now. Our only
income is currently my father’s job at a private university and despite
how it works in the US (as I have been told) the salaries here for
university teachers are quite low. We get money from the extra works from my parents, but that rarely happens.
I go to a private university but one of my father’s work's benefits is
that I can go to that university for free, otherwise I wouldn't even
think of attending there. My parents were very clear when I was
graduating high school: they listed the public universities and
the one where my dad works. "We can't pay for your education,"
they said. “But we want you to have one."
Therefore, in the early years of my country's revolution we had to
move from our house to my grandmother's house, luckily she had that
extra space; otherwise I don't know where we’d be living now. Still
it is a home but we don't feel it is like ours.
Our maid has been living with us for more than 10 years. It is a luxury
I recognize but perhaps there are some cultural issues you don't quite
understand. And since it is my culture I don't know how to explain it
either. She's like family for me and she helps us a lot since we are a
big family and we all have to work or study all day. My mom would
stop the TV cable or even phone services before firing the maid. I
know, again this is hard to understand, I know that US people except
if they are filthy rich are not used to having a maid.
About this trip to Mexico, I don't have money for travel anywhere
outside my country. My parents took me to Disney World when I was a
little girl but those were different times. A couple of years ago I
took an exam and I was selected from more than 300 students to represent my university at an international event. That's why I
traveled to Mexico on a class trip. This trip was 100% sponsored by
several companies and organizations, and as far as I am concerned it was for free. It was one of those lifetime opportunities. I studied so
hard for being able to go there. I can't travel to Mexico on my own so
I felt terrible when you quoted that trip as an example of my wealthy
life.
I'm still part of an elite, even if it’s one that is losing all it had
little by little. For me the fear of losing my status and political
repression comes into the same bag. Perhaps I'm mistaken, perhaps I'm
confusing things. Yes, I considered that option many times. I know
that while I have internet access even without a very wealthy
economic situation many people like me live with less than 2 dollars
a day. You don't have to put that in my face, I live in Caracas and I
see them every day. I take the same buses people with less money than
I take. I know we are not equal and this goes beyond economic
status and goes throughout routines and life perspectives. I still
pursue the illusion that we all must have something in common. I hate
the tag "poor", just as I hate the tag "rich". It makes this huge barrier
made of prejudice that I feel so weak to pass it. It creates a life made
of "ad hominem fallacies."
So I propose this: whenever you read my blog judge me for the
words I write and not for who I am because beyond the surface as you
can see, things are not that simple. You probably pictured me as a
filthy rich girl giving orders to a maid while she's smiles and
prepares herself to go with a few friends to Mexico, ignoring the
reality millions live in her country. I hope I made you notice with
this that this goes farther than reality. I know what Marx tell us
about the super-structure and the fake conscience, I'm just making the
naive request to forget about Marx for a minute and put yourself in my
shoes. I'm more than the voice of the powerful voices, and I'm quite
far from being part of the powerful people of my country myself.
I'm just an intellectual who can crash sometimes in the parties of the
ones who really hold power here. I share many things with them, but
money and trips abroad aren’t part of those things. Being part of the
middle class as Bourdieu pointed out kind of across his work is being
part of the confusion. Is being someone who is not rich and is not
poor either; who feels constantly pulled by both extremes of the
economic spectrum without knowing to who it should feel more related
to. I'm far from having millions of dollars over my keyboard.
Julia_1984
(I don't give my full name for protection)
Author of the blog "The end of Venezuela as I know it"
Your name is apt, Ivory Tower.
I will add this comment for the benefit of those reading your blog not for yourself since it strikes you are of a closed mind:
You say that the decision to close a media outlet is questionable but since it participated in a coup this should give us pause. Any issue should give you pause while you analyze it and try to find out some facts. However you failed to elaborate, failed to investigate and you forgot to pause, you went on.
Here I have some facts for you:
Said media outlet was but one of four media outlets that engaged in the news blackout that ocurred during the coup. If such behaviour is cause or justification for closing a media outlet then why were not all four outlets closed? Why just this particular one?
Second, if this is indeed criminal behaviour such charges should be brought to a court of law and allow the defendent due process and the opportunity to hear him out. Allow a judge to decide if the media outlet eganged and criminal behaviour and sanction them, revoke the licencse and be done with it. In this case there was no due process, no criminal charges levied. According to the government it was only an administrative decision to not renew a license. If the coup is a reason why wait 5 years? Why are no criminal charges levied against the media outlet? This is a serious charge and any serious goverment should have done something a long long time ago. Not now after a license is supposed to expire.
This action is more than questionable; it reeks of politics. I won't even start on the legal issues because it's a quagmire; the telecommunications law was changed in the year 2000 and different legal minds are questionning whether the wording in there granted a new extension on the license or not. At the very least this question should have been resolved in a court of law. It was not, it was basically ignored by the goverment.
It is always interesting to get a note from the ideological battleground of Venezuela, because when you don’t agree with one of the very partisan sides in the battle, you are characterized as having a closed mind. (You might want to see ”Unplugging RCTV: Analyzing the Aftermath” for the flip side of that ideological coin.)
Velmeran makes some good points. Yes, a variety of media outlets participated in what has been characterized as a media coup, and they have not been treated equally afterward. However, just because they weren’t treated equally doesn’t excuse what each station did, including RCTV.
Obviously, the legal system in Venezuela has issues when it comes to equal treatment before the law and the rule of law. Nevertheless, this is a typical argument in this case: look at what the other networks did and how they got off. Does this not sound like the speeder caught by the cop who points out all the other speeders on the highway? Or perhaps compare this to members of a conspiracy who are caught: some plead their case to cooperate with the state, and thus face little or no penalty, and then the state piles its considerable weight on one defendant. It does not seem just, but there it is. But no question, this is not completely fair.
However, if you want fairness, please be fair in how you characterize what is written here: you are commenting on an article written more than two months before RCTV had its broadcast license removed. And this blog has tracked a variety of items, criticizing both sides, during that battle.
Criminal charges are being pursued against RCTV. Please see the post ”Chavez Takes the Gloves Off Against RCTV” for the details of that case.
Also, please note that this blog has called for RCTV to receive a fair and just hearing and due process of law on various occasions. Please see ”Hugo Chavez v. The Media: Next Round” for more. This blog has written about the need for RCTV to receive a fair international hearing before the Inter-American Court on Human Rights too. For the latest, please see: ”The Return of Venezuela’s RCTV”
This is a complex issue, and this blog has treated it as such. That is why you will find at least ten different posts here, which explore the RCTV issue in some depth. I might point out that this post mentioned RCTV in passing, and is about a different but related topic: privilege and the internet. Some of what is written here seems to prove the original points of the initial posting.
Post a Comment